"The Effects of Broadband to GDP"
I read the
article entitled, “Broadband Penetration and Economic Growth” by Ben Rooney in
The Wall Street Journal published on July 19th, 2013. It looks at data produced by
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and draws a
relationship between the percentage of a given countries’ population that has a
broadband connection and average GDP (gross domestic product) per capita of
that country. The main graphic shows this relationship between these two
statistics from 34 different countries in an unconvincing fashion. The
histogram with an overlaid line plot has a simple correlation of 0.64, which is
not a strong correlation. The author suggests that if you remove the outlier,
Luxembourg, the simple correlation would increase to 0.77. That’s problematic
because Luxembourg has the highest GDP per capita by far at approximately
$90,000 USD PPP in 2011 with only 32% broadband penetration. I disagree with
removing Luxembourg, also because this study only has 34 countries. There has
been enough selection already.
It seems as though the article is attempting to
support the likely outcome, which is that greater broadband penetration
increases productivity. Luxembourg’s GDP clearly outpaces its broadband
penetration, which begs the question why? The financial sector is one of the
largest contributors to the Luxembourg economy. Perhaps broadband penetration
helps certain industries more than others. Economies that rely on technology, research
and financials would benefit more from broadband than farming, manufacturing
and other labor-intensive economies. I argue that the industries, businesses
and individuals that would materially benefit from broadband connectivity will
seek it out, because their livelihood depends on it. The rest will see it as an
unnecessary expense. Thus, the penetration rates will reflect the demand for
broadband in a given country. They won’t necessarily indicate a material
increase in productivity, unless only those who use it to increase productivity
actually get it.
Other
factors to consider are population, culture and growth. The 3 countries with
the highest broadband penetration (Switzerland, Netherland and Denmark) all
have populations of less than 16 million. Those countries also have significant
technology sectors’ contributing to their GDP. Notable for its
absence on this list is China. With 1.3 Billion citizens it would take a
monumental effort to achieve the lowest broadband penetration rate on this
chart of 10% (in Turkey). With a per capita GDP of only $9,233 (Wikipedia) and
an economic dependence on cheap manufacturing, China will likely be lagging in
this list for years to come. Yet China is a very rich and successful country.
Broadband penetration rates are not a good
indicator of GDP growth. There are many uses for broadband that have nothing to
do with productivity. For instance, if internet gaming drives broadband
penetration in developing countries, I doubt there will be a correlated
increase in GDP. The likelihood is that the broadband consumers that need it to
increase productivity set up their connections already. Now that the costs of
broadband are coming down, it is more likely that recreational broadband users
represent the vast majority of those who don’t have a connection. The most
reasonable conclusion I could come up with is that broadband does not boost
efficiency across the board. Rather, it is more beneficial to some than others.
Reference:
Rooney, Ben. "Broadband Penetration and Economic Growth." Wall
Street Journal. N.p., 19 July 2013. Web. 10 Oct. 2013.
<http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2013/07/19/broadband-penetration-and-
economic-growth/>.
No comments:
Post a Comment